A short synopsis of this article: There are several translations, however, some of which are listed at the end of this article, which do NOT make this mistake.
Jean Bethke Elshtain, Professor, University of Chicago and Co-chair, Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life Professor Elshtain is a political philosopher whose task has been to show the connections between our political and our ethical convictions.
He is the author of numerous works, including Cross, Crescent, and Sword: My name is Melissa Rogers. The Forum serves as a clearinghouse of information and as a town hall on issues at the intersection of religion and public affairs.
The co-chairs of the Forum are E. It has come to my attention that, quite unintentionally, we have scheduled this event during a Muslim prayer time. Apparently this conflict has prevented some of our Muslim friends from joining us today. I appreciate the fact that someone brought this to my attention and apologize for the schedule conflict.
I know that we all share the deep sadness of fellow Americans over the incalculable losses suffered through the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. In the wake of these attacks, we are facing a host of critical issues, and, of course, religion has much to say about these issues.
Today we discuss the just war tradition, its origins and principles and the ways in which it might apply to a war on terrorism. We are fortunate to have speakers today who are three distinguished scholars on the topic of ethics and the use of military force.
Each of them is a prolific and critically acclaimed author on this subject, as well as many others. There is really no way to do justice to their reputations and the breadth of their knowledge and writing in just a few moments.
So please know that all I can do is give you just the barest glimpse of their work.
International Politics, an Ethical Discourse. And in a moment she will join us to discuss the origins, background and basic principles of the Just war theory.
Her friend and colleague Michael Walzer calls her a truly independent, deeply serious, politically engaged and wonderfully provocative political theorist.
Professor Hauerwas is the Gilbert T. Rowe professor of theological ethics in the Divinity School and professor of law at Duke University. A Primer in Christian Ethics. Reflections on the Morality of the Persian Gulf War. Cavanagh said, and I quote: Finally, Professor James Turner Johnson will join us in discussion.
Professor Johnson is a professor of religion and associate member of the Graduate Department of Political Science at Rutgers University. So I welcome all our speakers. I will ask Jean Elshtain to join us first, and then we will welcome your joining into the discussion.
Thank you very much for being with us today. Good afternoon and thank you very much, Melissa. From President George W. Bush to the average man and woman on the street, Americans are evoking the language of justice to characterize our response to the despicable deeds perpetrated against innocent men, women and children on September 11th.
When they do this, they tap into a complex tradition called Just war. He comes to the conclusion that wars of aggression and aggrandizement are never acceptable, but there are occasions when resort to force may be tragically necessary; not a normative good, but tragically necessary.
What then makes the use of force justifiable? For Augustine, the most potent justification is to protect the innocent, and the innocent in the scheme of things are those in no position to defend themselves, to protect them from certain harm.
If one has compelling evidence that harm will come to persons unless action involving coercive force is taken, a requirement of neighbor love may be a resort to arms. According to Augustine, it is better for the Christian to suffer harm rather than to commit it. But are we permitted to make that commitment to non- self-defense for others?
I would say not. That response involves just punishment, not in order to inflict grievous harm on the non-combatants of a country or a group whose operatives have harmed your citizens, but to interdict in order to prevent further harm and to punish those responsible for the harm that has already occurred.
And this, of course, takes place in a world that international relations theorists called a world of self-help. And in responding in a way that abides by certain limits, one reaffirms a world of moral responsibility and justice.
When a wound as grievous as that of September 11 has been inflicted on a body politic, it would be irresponsible, it would be a dereliction of duty, it would be a flight from the serious vocation of politics to fail to respond.Just and Unjust Laws: According to Dr. Martin Luther King jr. I was reminded recently of a post I published – when I was still studying law – about just and unjust laws based on Dr.
Martin. Understand the objective of an analytical essay. An analytical essay means you will need to present some type of argument, or claim, about what you are regardbouddhiste.com often you will have to analyze another piece of writing or a film, but you could also be asked to analyze an issue, or an idea.
Printed from regardbouddhiste.com On the Trial of Jesus. The purpose of this essay is to provide an overview of the many issues and questions.
These excerpts, from sections 1 though 14 of The Birth of Tragedy, are provided courtesy of the translator, Professor Ian Johnston of Malaspina University-College, Nanaimo, British Columbia.
Prof. Johnston has made available a large number of splendid translations of classic texts. The Just War Theory The Just war theory is and interesting one simply because the phrase just war is an oxymoron. War is defined by the Merriam-Webster dictionary as a state of usually open and declared armed hostile conflict between states or nations.
Neoliberalism is promoted as the mechanism for global trade and investment supposedly for all nations to prosper and develop fairly and equitably.