The plain view doctrine and potential

Board of Education Plain View Doctrine The plain view doctrine allows a police officer to take any evidence of a crime or contraband that is found in plain sight during a normal observation. The police officer does not need a warrant in such a case to collect that evidence. For example, the plain view doctrine is used often during screenings of passengers at U.

The plain view doctrine and potential

The Existence of God A. Place of the Doctrine of God in Dogmatics. The prevailing opinion has always recognized this as the most logical procedure and still points in the same direction. In many instances even they whose fundamental principles would seem to require another arrangement, continue the traditional practice.

There are good reasons for starting with the doctrine of God, if we proceed on the assumption that theology is the systematized knowledge of God, of whom, through whom, and unto whom, are all things.

Instead of being surprised that Dogmatics should begin with the doctrine of God, we might well expect it to be a study of God throughout in all its ramifications, from the beginning to the end. As a matter of fact, that is exactly what it is intended to be, though only the first locus deals with God directly, while the succeeding ones treat of Him more indirectly.

We start the study of theology with two presuppositions, namely 1 that God exists, and 2 that He has revealed Himself in His divine Word. And for that reason it is not impossible for us to start with the study of God.

We can turn to His revelation, in order to learn what He has revealed concerning Himself and concerning His relation to His creatures. Attempts have been made in the course of time to distribute the material of Dogmatics in such a way as to exhibit clearly that it is, not merely in one locus, but in its entirety, a study of God.

This was done by the application of the trinitarian method, which arranges the subject-matter of Dogmatics under the three headings of 1 the Father 2 the Son, and 3 the Holy Spirit.

Neither one of these can be called very successful. Up to the beginning of the nineteenth century the practice was all but general to begin the study of Dogmatics with the doctrine of God; but a change came about under the influence of Schleiermacher, who sought to safeguard the scientific character of theology by the introduction of a new method.

The religious consciousness of man was substituted for the Word of God as the source of theology. Religion gradually took the place of God as the object of theology. Man ceased to recognize the knowledge of God as something that was given in Scripture, and began to pride himself on being a seeker after God.

Under such circumstances it was but natural that some should regard it as incongruous to begin Dogmatics with the study of God. It is rather surprising that so many, in spite of their subjectivism, continued the traditional arrangement. Some, however, sensed the incongruity and struck out in a different way.

He does not deal with the doctrine of God connectedly, but only in fragments, and concludes his work with a discussion of the Trinity. His starting point is anthropological rather than theological.

Some of the mediating theologians were influenced to such an extent by Schleiermacher that they logically began their dogmatic treatises with the study of man. Even in the present day this arrangement is occasionally followed.

A striking example of it is found in the work of O. Curtis on The Christian Faith.

The 10th Amendment, anti-commandeering and sports betting: In Plain English - SCOTUSblog

This begins with the doctrine of man and concludes with the doctrine of God. Ritschlian theology might seem to call for still another starting point, since it finds the objective revelation of God, not in the Bible as the divinely inspired Word, but in Christ as the Founder of the Kingdom of God, and considers the idea of the Kingdom as the central and all-controlling concept of theology.

However, Ritschlian dogmaticians, such as Herrmann.Generally, under the 4 th Amendment, police officers are required to obtain a warrant or identify an accepted exception to the 4 th Amendment in order to conduct searches and seizures of individuals. One of these exceptions is the doctrine of plain view.

The plain view doctrine and potential

Plain View. The doctrine of plain view . Book of Mormon Problems. LDS Church members are taught that the Book of Mormon (BOM) is scripture, as well as a true record of the inhabitants of the Americas from about BC to AD.

The Biblical Design for Human Sexuality by Rich Deem Introduction. There are many misunderstandings about what Christianity teaches about human sexuality and sexual relationships.

10) However, the plain view doctrine is a separate seizure doctrine, not an exception to the search warrant requirement and, therefore, viewing one document that may be used as evidence of a crime does not necessarily permit the search or seizure of the entire computer. Under the plain view doctrine, the police may seize anything they find through the use of their senses that they have probable cause to think is contraband or evidence of a crime so long as they can seize it from a place where they have a right to be.

Water Science Glossary of Terms. Here's a list of water-related terms that might help you understand our site better. It is compiled from a number of sources and should not be considered an "official" U.S. Geological Survey water glossary.

Information Operations (United States) - Wikipedia